lundi 26 octobre 2015

he other benefit to eating less red meat

Marion Nestle is a sociology professor and Paulette Goddard professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies and Public Health at New York University. She is also an author, most recently of "Soda Politics: Taking on Big Soda (and Winning)." She blogs at foodpolitics.com.
(CNN)The just-released report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer judging processed meat as clearly carcinogenic and red meat as probably carcinogenic has caused consternation among meat producers and consumers.
Meat producers do not like the "eat less meat" message. Consumers do not want to give up their bacon and hamburgers -- delicious and also icons of the American way of life.
Marion Nestle
But these judgments should come as no surprise to anyone. Eating less processed and red meat has been accepted dietary advice since Ancel and Margaret Keys wrote their diet book for heart disease prevention, "Eat Well and Stay Well," in 1959. Their advice: "restrict saturated fats, the fats in beef, pork, lamb, sausages ..." They aimed this advice at reducing saturated fat to prevent heart disease. Federal committees and agencies have continued issuing such heart-disease advice to the present day.
Cancer entered the picture in the 1970s, when scientists began to link red meat -- beef, pork, lamb -- to the risk of cancers of the colon and rectum. Even after several decades of research, they had a hard time deciding whether the culprit in meat was fat, saturated fat, protein, carcinogens induced when meat is cooked to high temperatures or some other component.
In the mid-1990s, dietary guidelines committees advised eating lean meats and limiting intake of processed meats, still because of their high fat content. By the late 1990s, cancer experts said that red meat "probably" increases the risk of colorectal cancers, and "possibly" increases the risk of cancers of the pancreas, breast, prostate and kidney. The IARC report, based on more recent evidence, makes even stronger recommendations and favors carcinogens as the causative factors.
10 photos: What nutritionists choose at McDonalds
10 photos: What nutritionists choose at McDonalds
10 photos: What nutritionists choose at McDonalds
10 photos: What nutritionists choose at McDonalds
10 photos: What nutritionists choose at McDonalds
10 photos: What nutritionists choose at McDonalds

Aucun commentaire: